Understanding Appropriate and Inappropriate Forum in Divorce Applications in Melbourne, Australia
Are you considering getting a divorce in Melbourne, Australia, but don't know which court has jurisdiction to hear your case? Understanding the concept of appropriate and inappropriate forum can help you navigate the legal system with ease. In this article, we will explain what appropriate and inappropriate forum mean and how they apply in divorce matters in Melbourne.
What is an appropriate forum?
An appropriate forum refers to a court or tribunal that has the jurisdiction to hear and determine a legal matter. The concept of an appropriate forum is based on the principle that a court or tribunal should only hear cases within its jurisdiction and expertise, and that parties should have access to a forum that is fair, impartial, and efficient.
In Australia, pursuant to s 39 and Pt VI of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (FLA), the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (FCFCOA) is prima facie the appropriate forum to hear a divorce application, and all divorce applications are filed in this court. Subject to the various requirements of these sections of the FLA being met, the majority of divorce applications will proceed through the FCFCOA with relatively little issue.
What is an inappropriate forum?
An inappropriate forum arises where a court would otherwise have jurisdiction but, nonetheless, makes a determination that it is not suitable or convenient for the case to be heard. Typically, an inappropriate forum will arise where there are competing jurisdictions, one of which is usually a foreign jurisdiction. The concept of an inappropriate forum is closely related to the legal principle of forum non conveniens, which allows a court to decline jurisdiction over a case if it determines that another forum would be more appropriate for the case to be heard. If the court determines that the forum in which the case has been brought is inappropriate, it may stay or dismiss the proceedings and allow the parties to bring the case in a more appropriate forum.
Factors to consider when determining an appropriate forum
The test for stay of proceedings in transnational cases was laid down by the High Court in 1990 in Voth v Manildra Flour Mills (Voth). Since then, an Australian court will only decline jurisdiction where it considers itself a “clearly inappropriate forum” to resolve a dispute. An application for a stay of proceedings on the ground of forum non conveniens is ordinarily made by a party with the intention that the proceedings be litigated in another jurisdiction.
Cases set out a number of relevant issues for the courts to consider when deciding whether to dismiss or stay a matter:
proceedings which are oppressive, vexatious or an abuse of process to a party;
the avoidance of injustice between parties;
connecting factors which indicate that justice can be done in the other forum at substantially less inconvenience or expense (such as the availability of witnesses);
the “natural forum” being the place where the parties have the most real and substantial connection, such as where the parties respectively reside or carry on business; and
“legitimate personal or juridical advantage”: Voth at 564–565.
The relevance of the appropriateness of the forum in divorce matters The question as to whether the Australian court has jurisdiction to deal with a divorce application often arises where the parties have married or lived in another country, a situation that is becoming increasingly common. In Australia, the FCFCOA’s power in respect of determining a divorce application is not related to dealing with an application for parenting orders or property orders; however, in many foreign jurisdictions, the divorce, parenting and property determinations are intertwined. Therefore, if a party seeks to obtain divorce orders from the Australian court, there may be a question as to whether the Australian court has jurisdiction to hear those applications, particularly if there are competing proceedings in another country.
In these situations, the appropriate forum will depend on the specific circumstances of the case. The court will consider factors such as the connection of the parties and the dispute to each jurisdiction, the convenience and expense of litigating in each forum, and the interests of justice.
In conclusion, understanding the concept of appropriate and inappropriate forum is crucial in divorce matters in Melbourne, Australia. While the FCFCOA is usually the appropriate forum for divorce applications, determining the appropriate forum for other related matters can be complex and may require the assistance of a family lawyer in Australia.
Online Divorce Application
If you would like to get a divorce , you can get started using our our online divorce platform. Our platform streamlines the divorce process and makes it easy for you to get started. Contact us today to learn more about our services and how we can help you with your divorce.
